AI Trends· Sandi Samantaray· Chapter 2 — The Distribution OS
March 2026 · Plugin Economy · Platform Analysis

The
Distribution
OS

Claude's plugin registry is not a feature. It is a distribution layer — the place where developers already are, where tools get their users, and where software infrastructure either earns its position or gets absorbed into context. This report maps who wins, who compresses, and who disappears.

Chapter 2 · March 2026 · 277K+ installs · 9,000+ plugins · 4 outcome tiers · Marketplace · Cowork
Core Thesis
"The plugin is the means. Distribution is the end. Claude's registry is where developers live, where tools get their users, and where software infrastructure either earns its seat at the table or gets absorbed into context."
$0
Customer acquisition cost
per install via Claude plugin
vs. $500–$2,000 traditional SaaS CAC
277K+
Frontend Design installs — #1 plugin in the official registry, March 2026
9,000+
Community MCP servers — from zero in Nov 2024, across all plugin categories
Cowork vertical plugins shipped Jan 30, 2026. Legal, finance, sales, data, marketing, support.
Claude Marketplace launch partners (Mar 6): GitLab, Harvey, Lovable, Replit, Rogo, Snowflake.
0%
Revenue share Anthropic takes at launch. No commission. Platform leverage without the cut.
§ 01The Plugin Leaderboard
Install counts from the official Claude registry, March 2026. Anchored = infrastructure vendors strengthened by distribution. Amplified = value compounds as Claude grows. Absorbed = workflow compression risk. Cowork = Anthropic's own vertical plugins, new category Jan 2026.
Anchored — infrastructure
Amplified — compounds with Claude
Absorbed — workflow compression
Cowork — Anthropic vertical plugins
#
Plugin / Server
Category
Install Volume
Tier
§ 02The Reframe: Distribution, Not Disruption
The obvious framing — "Claude plugins threaten the products they host" — misses the more interesting story. Vendors are racing to build MCP integrations because it makes commercial sense. Here is why, and where the real pressure sits.

When Stripe built its Claude MCP server, it did so because Claude's user base is one of the most commercially valuable developer demographics on earth — and a plugin install is a warm introduction to every one of them at the exact moment they're building something that needs payments. Customer acquisition costs in competitive SaaS categories sit between $500 and $2,000 per enterprise seat. A Claude plugin install is frictionless, intent-rich, and currently free.

This is not meaningfully different from what happened when AWS launched its Marketplace in 2012. ISVs didn't list because Amazon was threatening them — they listed because AWS had the distribution and the buyer intent. The plugin economy is the same mechanism, one abstraction layer higher.

The nuance is that not all vendors benefit equally. Infrastructure vendors gain users without any threat to their core product. Workflow and UI vendors gain reach but face a different pressure: their UI is being disintermediated. The tool is still being used. The dashboard is just no longer being opened. That distinction matters enormously at renewal.

"We used to open five tools. Now we open Claude. The Figma MCP means I haven't switched to the design app in three days. The GitHub MCP means my PR dashboard has cobwebs. This is the real moat."

— Hacker News · 2.4K upvotes · February 2026
⚑  Open Question at Time of Publication
The commercial model for agent routing remains unresolved. The distribution gains documented in this report assume the agent layer stays neutral. There is an emerging argument that MCP routing will evolve toward a paid placement structure, where vendors pay the model provider for preferential position rather than the CAC savings flowing to the vendor. If that plays out, the plugin economy does not eliminate intermediation — it relocates it, moving the toll gate from search advertising to the model provider's routing layer.
§ 03The Absorption Spectrum
Three tiers describing where pressure sits — not binary verdicts on survival. Distribution moats, enterprise contracts, and pricing power are real. "Absorbed" means the core interaction surface is under structural pressure; it does not mean the company ceases to exist. The question is not "does this company die?" but "where does its next decade of growth come from, and is that path still open?"
▲ Anchored
Plugin = Distribution Channel
Why They're Protected
Strategic Signal
GitHub
Code lives on GitHub. The network, commit graph, CI hooks, team permissions — Claude reads and writes via MCP (112K installs), but cannot be GitHub. Every Claude Code user is now a GitHub API consumer at higher velocity.
Network effect is jurisdictional. Branch protection, Actions pipelines, and audit logs are governed by org policy. Claude is an agent on top, not a replacement below.
Claude amplifies GitHub's surface area. The install base reflects connection, not substitution.
Vercel
Claude does not run servers. Vercel handles deployment, edge functions, domain routing, SSL. The MCP plugin lets Claude trigger deploys and read logs — new capability for Claude, not a threat to Vercel's infrastructure.
Infrastructure is exempt from context absorption. Claude can reason about a deployment; it cannot execute one without Vercel's runtime.
Devs who deploy via Claude prompt are stickier Vercel customers. The plugin is a retention play.
Stripe
Payment rails are regulated infrastructure. Claude can help write integration code — it cannot hold funds, process transactions, or replace the compliance layer Stripe provides under PCI-DSS and global frameworks.
Regulatory moat is the deepest possible protection. The plugin makes devs ship payment features faster, which directly increases Stripe transaction volume. Perfect revenue alignment.
"I set up a payment flow in 12 minutes without once opening the Stripe dashboard. They got a new customer." — X, 18K impressions
Supabase / Firebase
37.4K installs for Supabase. The database is the source of truth — Claude can query, migrate, and scaffold against it, but the data lives in Supabase and is not portable to Claude's session at enterprise scale.
Data sovereignty and cost at scale. Enterprise databases cannot be kept inside a context window. The plugin is a productivity multiplier; the database is the system of record.
Every Claude Code session touching Supabase is a user who never considered switching.
Slack
Slack's value is the human communication network inside an organisation — years of context, decisions, and DMs. Claude's MCP reads and writes to Slack; it does not replace the team's fabric.
Human network effects compound over time. Enterprise IT governance (SOC2, HIPAA, eDiscovery) means Slack isn't being replaced by inference sessions.
Slack gains Claude as a power consumer of its API. New features will likely be MCP-native first.
~ Amplified
Gains Distribution, Faces UI Pressure
The Tension
Strategic Signal
Figma
45.3K installs. Figma as design source of truth — component libraries, brand tokens, design system governance — is irreplaceable at team level. But Figma as the place where individual design decisions get made is under pressure from Frontend Design at 277K installs.
Figma's moat is collaborative design system ownership, not individual creation speed. As long as teams need a shared design source of truth, Figma survives. Individual UI iteration is being absorbed.
Figma's MCP is both a distribution win and a competitive hedge. They are building toward agentic design tools themselves.
Atlassian
32.1K installs. Jira as enterprise system of record for software delivery — audit trails, compliance reporting, legal accountability — is deeply entrenched. But opening Jira to log a ticket is being replaced: "Claude, update that ticket to In Review."
Atlassian's enterprise agreements protect at the org level. Jira's data stays intact; engagement declines. Declining engagement weakens the qualitative case at renewal even when the data layer remains.
Block built 60+ internal MCP servers using Atlassian as a data backend. Jira becomes infrastructure, not UI.
Notion
24.6K installs. Notion as company wiki has more resilience than Notion as task manager. The wiki function requires human curation Claude can assist but not own. The task layer faces near-total pressure for smaller teams.
Notion's vulnerability is its identity: trying to be everything. The wisest move is leaning into being the persistent knowledge layer Claude reasons against — not competing on workflow speed.
Power users are already writing less in Notion and using Claude to surface content from it. Repositioning is visible.
HubSpot / ZoomInfo
CRM and sales intelligence platforms gain distribution via Claude — every sales email and prospect research task flows through Claude's MCP to their data. HubSpot's 200K+ customers and ZoomInfo's data moat (verified mobile numbers, intent signals) are not at existential risk.
The interaction layer (the CRM dashboard, the prospecting UI) is being replaced by prompts while the data stays put. Net-positive for near-term API revenue. Renewal conversations in 2027 will be harder when the champion who lived in the dashboard is gone.
Strengthen at the enterprise data layer while facing SMB seat compression. Pricing shift from per-seat to per-API-call is the adaptation path.
↓ Absorbed
Core Value Prop Replicable by Claude
The Mechanism
What Happens Next
Standalone Code Search
Codebase search and semantic navigation are now native Claude capabilities when combined with Context7 (158K installs) and language server plugins. The category was absorbed. Greptile's co-founder publicly confirmed repositioning around enterprise data compliance.
Claude's context window + full repo + language server semantics = the codebase search product. No separate UI, no separate subscription required.
Repositioning around data compliance, on-prem deployment, and regulated industries — the only escapes from context absorption.
Generic AI Copywriting
AI copywriting tools built on top of language models with no proprietary data, no network effects, no distribution advantage. Claude's base capability exceeds what these tools offered. Jasper raised at $1.5B on a product that is now a prompt.
The model layer was always the product. Once direct access became easy, the wrapper became overhead. New customer pipeline is the leading indicator — not existing ARR.
Category absorbed. Companies may survive as professional services or niche brand-voice tools.
Standup / Status Tools
Automated standup tools whose entire product is a scheduled prompt and a Slack post. Ralph Loop + Slack + Claude replicates this with more context and zero additional subscription cost.
Product is a prompt. No data moat, no infrastructure moat. The most direct examples of workflow-only products in the current ecosystem.
Absorption is already underway. These are sub-$5M ARR products with no structural defence.
§ 04The Talent Reckoning
The plugin economy is not just a platform shift — it is a skills market inversion. Three columns track what compresses, what transforms, and what emerges as a new craft.
↓ Under Pressure
↑ Rising
Integration / Glue Code Engineer
MCP standardises what was a $100K+ role at every mid-size tech company. Writing custom API connectors and webhook handlers is now a plugin install. The engineer who wrote the Linear-to-GitHub sync script now installs an MCP server instead.
Context Engineer
Gartner's designated next vital skill for AI-enabled development. Not prompt engineering — context engineering is the architecture of what an agent knows, when, and in what order. With 9,000+ MCP servers available, the context layer is now critical infrastructure needing dedicated ownership.
Prompt Engineer (standalone role)
The title peaked in 2024. By 2026, prompt engineering has been absorbed into context engineering and AI engineering broadly. Writing a good system prompt is a baseline skill, not a job title.
MCP Server Architect
Block built 60+ internal MCP servers in 2025 alone. Every enterprise building on AI needs someone who understands MCP server design, tool annotation, multi-tenancy patterns, and OAuth 2.1 flows. Demand is visibly outpacing supply.
SaaS UX Designer (PM-tool focus)
If the UI is not being opened, optimising it is a declining investment. Frontend Design at 277K installs signals where this energy flows: AI-generated UI, not crafted UI for a SaaS nobody opens.
Agent Orchestration Engineer
Multiple Claude Code instances in parallel, each with different plugin combinations for specialised tasks. Designing and maintaining these agent fleets is a new engineering discipline. Someone has to build the fleet.
QA Engineer → Agent QA Specialist
Test execution is becoming an agent activity. The QA engineer of 2026 evaluates whether the agent's tests cover the right thing — not writes the test scripts themselves. Playwright MCP at 79.6K installs confirms the direction.
AI Governance / Trust Engineer
Tool poisoning, prompt injection, OAuth token storage risks, and Confused Deputy attacks have all been disclosed in the ecosystem's first year. "Who is accountable for our AI?" is a board-level question. Governance officers are in demand at banks, healthcare organisations, and Fortune 500 companies.

"Context engineering is starting to feel like a full-time job. We're at the Kubernetes moment — complexity spawning platform teams. Expect ‘AI Enablement’ specialists who own the context layer the way DevOps teams own CI/CD."

— dev.to · Staff Developer Advocate, Block · January 2026 · 4.1K reads
§ 05The Commercial Calculus
What does it mean in unit economics to be a Claude plugin? The acquisition math, the revenue share reality, and the strategic postures available to vendors at each tier.
The Acquisition Math

A Slack MCP integration reaching 50,000 installs on Claude is the equivalent of acquiring 50,000 engaged developer users at near-zero marginal cost. In enterprise SaaS, where CAC runs $500–$2,000 per seat in competitive categories, this is a significant arbitrage.

The qualifier: install intent is not revenue intent. A developer installing the Notion plugin is already a Notion user. The distribution play primarily benefits vendors with wide potential market but incomplete penetration.

Infrastructure vendors (Stripe, Supabase, Firebase) see a direct correlation between plugin usage and revenue. For UI-layer vendors, the attribution is murkier — and the long-term data on whether being a plugin increases or decreases subscription retention does not yet exist.

The Revenue Share Reality

Anthropic currently takes zero revenue share from plugin installs and zero commission from the Marketplace at launch. This mirrors the early AWS Marketplace model before tiered pricing tightened.

The platform risk is real: Anthropic controls the registry, the distribution surface, and the context in which vendors appear. They can deprecate a plugin, demote it in recommendations, or build the capability natively — as happened to standalone code search tools.

The strategic implication: become the data layer Claude calls, not the feature Claude ships. Infrastructure vendors with regulated data and network effects are the durable position. UI-layer features are perpetually at risk of being absorbed — either by Anthropic building natively or by community servers undercutting at zero cost.

Vendor TypePlugin CAC BenefitRevenue AttributionPlatform RiskNet Verdict
Stripe / Supabase
Infrastructure
Near-zero CAC for new developer onboarding at point of integration decision Direct — each API call is billable. Plugin usage = measurable revenue event. Low — Claude does not run payment rails or databases. Regulated moat holds. Strong Win
GitHub / Vercel
Dev Platform
Deepens engagement from existing users; increases API surface area adoption Indirect but strong — more deployments, more Actions runs, more storage usage. Low — code and deployment infra cannot be absorbed. Network effect is structural. Clear Win
Figma / Atlassian
Workflow Platform
High distribution to new user segments; top-of-funnel expansion is real Ambiguous — seat count stable, but UI page views decline. Engagement metrics soften. Medium — enterprise contracts protect revenue. Individual user engagement erodes quietly. Net Positive, Monitor
Notion / Linear
PM / Knowledge
Meaningful new developer exposure; installs from Claude users who were not customers Weak — if users never open the UI, retention and expansion suffer despite data use. High — core interaction (creating/updating tasks) is a pure context operation. Absorbable. Watch Closely
HubSpot / ZoomInfo
CRM / Intelligence
Significant — Claude used for sales tasks; MCP puts vendor's data at point of decision Mixed — more API calls but UI engagement falls. Stickiness shifts to data quality. Medium — data moat is real. Headcount compression at customer companies is the mechanism. Transition Required
§ 06Claude as the New AWS — And What Regulators Will Do About It
The AWS parallel is about the moment when a platform becomes critical enough that every vendor must participate, regulators start paying attention, and open standards become the only political defence against gatekeeper designation. Anthropic is navigating all three simultaneously — and the regulatory clock is running 10 years faster than it did for AWS.
AWS in 2012
What It Commoditised
Servers, hosting, and compute — the physical layer of software deployment
The Developer Shift
Devs stopped caring about hardware. AWS became invisible infrastructure every vendor had to support.
The Distribution Moment
AWS Marketplace launched 2012. ISVs flooded in because AWS had the buyer intent and developer density.
Revenue Share Model
AWS charges 3–20% depending on category. This set the template for what platform economics look like once leverage accumulates.
Regulatory Response
Slow. AWS reached $60B revenue before serious antitrust scrutiny materialised.
Open Standards Play
AWS contributed to Kubernetes and OpenContainer as a regulatory hedge and ecosystem lock-in tool simultaneously.
Claude in 2026
What It Commoditises
The workflow and UI layer — the interaction surface of software sitting above infrastructure.
The Developer Shift
Devs stop caring about switching between apps. Claude becomes invisible workflow infrastructure every SaaS must support.
The Distribution Moment
Plugin registry launched Nov 2024. 9,000+ community servers in 16 months. Claude Marketplace launched Mar 6, 2026 at 0% commission.
Revenue Share Model
Currently 0%. No App Store tax. This changes as platform leverage increases. Marketplace launch is the first signal of how Anthropic builds commercial terms with partners.
Regulatory Response
Already accelerating. EU AI Act, Digital Markets Act, and data sovereignty questions are active now — not after $60B revenue. The cycle is 10x faster.
Open Standards Play
MCP donated to Linux Foundation (AAIF) Dec 2025. OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, AWS all co-founders. The regulatory hedge is happening in real time, in public.
§ 06.1Geographic Fragmentation of the Plugin Economy
MCP is a US-originated standard, administered via a US company, routing data through US inference infrastructure. Every geography has a different regulatory exposure. These are active, multi-jurisdictional concerns.
Geography / Framework
The Specific Exposure
The Mechanism
Risk Level
EU — GDPR & Digital Markets Act
When a German enterprise uses Claude MCP to query their Notion workspace, EU personal data transits through US inference infrastructure. MCP's OAuth token storage creates GDPR Chapter V transfer risks at every session.
If Claude reaches DMA gatekeeper scale, it faces mandatory interoperability requirements, prohibition on self-preferencing, and data portability obligations. DMA enforcement is actively targeting AI assistants in 2026.
HIGH — Active. DMA designation process accelerating.
EU — AI Act (Aug 2026)
Plugins enabling high-risk AI use cases (hiring decisions, credit scoring, medical diagnosis) require conformity assessments. Most plugin authors have not conducted these. The 9,000+ community servers are in a legal grey zone.
Anthropic must risk-classify every plugin in the official registry under Article 6. The Aug 2026 full-enforcement deadline is four months away.
HIGH — Aug 2026 deadline. Most plugin authors unprepared.
China
Claude is not available in mainland China. Chinese AI vendors are building competing plugin ecosystems that will not be MCP-interoperable. The open standard is Western.
For Western SaaS vendors with China operations, this creates a fork: build for MCP and build separately for Chinese AI platforms. Integration-layer work that was supposed to be write-once now requires two incompatible standards.
MED — Fragmentation risk for global SaaS vendors.
US — Antitrust
The 0% commission model is currently benign from an antitrust perspective. If Anthropic begins to discriminate between first-party and third-party plugins — recommending Claude-native features over vendor plugins — the App Store antitrust template becomes directly applicable.
The Linux Foundation AAIF structure is designed to prevent this. Open governance, vendor-neutral steering committee, no single company with veto power. This mirrors AWS's open source strategy exactly.
LOW currently — revenue share introduction is the trigger to watch.
§ 07Community Signal
What developers, engineers, and founders are actually saying across Hacker News, Reddit, X, GitHub, and Substack. The unfiltered developer consensus forming in parallel to press releases.
Hacker NewsDev Discourse

"MCP allows any client to dynamically discover and interact with any resource without custom glue code. Comparing it to local scripts is like calling USB a fad because parallel ports worked for printers. The power is standardisation: write once, support everywhere."

HN · Jan 20263.1K points

"The question isn't whether Claude Code competes with Linear or Notion. It's whether anyone will bother opening those UIs when Claude can do 80% of the job in context, without switching tabs."

HN · Feb 20261.8K points

"We built a codebase search integration. Twelve months later, Claude Code's native search and Context7 ate our primary value proposition. We're repositioning around enterprise data compliance."

HN · Jan 2026Greptile founder — confirmed pivot

"Donating MCP to the Linux Foundation is the single smartest regulatory move Anthropic has made. It's the same reason AWS contributed to Kubernetes. Open governance is an antitrust shield in plain sight."

HN · Dec 20252.6K points
Reddit / XCommunity Pulse

"We used to open five tools. Now we open Claude. The Figma MCP means I haven't switched to the design app in three days. The GitHub MCP means my PR dashboard has cobwebs."

r/ClaudeAI · Feb 20262.4K upvotes

"95% of MCP servers are garbage. The barrier to publishing one is basically zero. The official Claude registry is where the quality lives — but even there, quality varies wildly across 9,000 community servers."

r/mcp · Jan 20261.1K upvotes

"People are spinning up multiple Claude Code instances in parallel — one for frontend with Figma, one for backend migrations, one for security auditing. This is what a dev team looks like now."

X · Feb 202634K impressions

"The Linear MCP is an acquisition risk, not a distribution win. If devs live in Claude all day and never open Linear's UI, what is Linear's product actually selling? A data backend. That's a different business."

X · Dec 202551K impressions
Stack / GitHub / SubstackTechnical Depth

"The S in MCP stands for security. Hundreds of MCP servers online today are misconfigured. Tool poisoning, prompt injection via tool descriptions, OAuth token storage that gives attackers access to your entire stack — this ecosystem shipped fast and secured slowly."

Pomerium security blog · Jun 2025

"Block built 60+ MCP servers internally in 2025. The most important pattern: do not over-privilege your API tokens. One breach in MCP equals access to everything. Design for least privilege from day one."

Block engineering blog · 2025

"The Asana Confused Deputy vulnerability — where their MCP server cached responses without re-verifying tenant context — is the canary for enterprise multi-tenancy. Every SaaS vendor rushing to ship an MCP server is about to discover their auth model was built for direct API calls."

StackOne security analysis · Jun 2025

"Context engineering is the natural progression of prompt engineering. It's not about what you say — it's about everything the model knows when you say it. MCP is the protocol. Context engineering is the discipline."

Anthropic engineering blog · 2025
§ 08Distribution Gain vs. Absorption Risk
Each vendor plotted by distribution gain (x-axis) vs. absorption risk (y-axis). Bubble size reflects install count. Ideal quadrant: high distribution gain, low absorption risk — lower right. Danger zone: high gain, high risk — upper right.
Distribution Gain (x) vs. Absorption Risk (y) — Bubble = Install Volume
Plugin Install Volume by Category — March 2026
§ 09Nine Findings
Structural conclusions from the plugin data read through software, talent, commercial, and regulatory lenses.
01
The Plugin Is the Means. Distribution Is the End.
Vendors are acquiring developer users at near-zero CAC at the exact moment those users are making build decisions. The question is whether the distribution gain outlasts the absorption pressure. For infrastructure vendors, it does. For UI-layer vendors, the math is less clear.
02
Four Outcomes, Not Two: Strengthened · Compressed · Repositioned · Absorbed
The binary disruption framing is analytically wrong. Strengthened: Stripe, GitHub, Supabase, Vercel, Snowflake, Harvey — infra and data vendors strengthened by Claude distribution. Compressed: Slack, HubSpot, Atlassian — distribution moats hold but SMB seat-count growth stalls and 2027–2028 renewals will be smaller as customer teams shrink. Repositioned: Notion, ReadMe, Outreach. Absorbed: Jasper, Mabl, Standup.ly — workflow-only products with no data moat. Headcount compression at customer companies is the leading indicator. Revenue contraction at renewal is the lagging one.
03
Context Engineering Is the New Senior Skill
Gartner named it. Anthropic defined it. Block is hiring for it. Context engineering — managing what the agent knows, when, and in what order — is the successor to prompt engineering and the peer of DevOps in organisational importance. Every enterprise with agentic workloads in production will need a context engineering function by 2027.
04
The Linux Foundation Move Is a Regulatory Hedge
Anthropic donated MCP to the AAIF in December 2025 — the same month the Digital Markets Act began targeting AI assistants for potential gatekeeper designation. Open governance under the Linux Foundation neutralises the antitrust argument and creates a multi-stakeholder defence. AWS did this with Kubernetes. The playbook is confirmed.
05
Notion and Linear Are the Bellwether
Both are beloved, technically excellent products whose core interaction surface (creating and updating tasks, writing docs) is a pure context operation Claude can perform without their UI. Their install counts suggest engaged power users — but the trend line matters more than the snapshot. Watch churn data, not MRR.
06
The EU AI Act Deadline Is August 2026
The full EU AI Act comes into effect in four months. Most MCP plugin authors — including vendors shipping official integrations — have not conducted the conformity assessments required for high-risk use cases. The 9,000+ community MCP servers are in a complete legal grey zone. This is the next governance crisis for the plugin economy.
07
The Security Layer Is Immature at Scale
Tool poisoning, OAuth token storage risks, Confused Deputy multi-tenancy bugs (Asana), and the MCP Inspector RCE vulnerability have all been disclosed in the ecosystem's first year. The speed of adoption has outpaced security practices. AI governance officers are not optional at enterprise scale.
08
Frontend Design at #1 Is a Category Signal
277K+ installs — more than Context7 (158K), GitHub (112K), and Figma (45.3K) combined. The market voted for AI-native design generation as a primary workflow. The category of standalone AI design generation has moved into Claude's plugin layer. Figma's presence is a hedge, not a counter-move.
09
The Revenue Share Clock Is Running — But Anthropic's Incentives Are Symbiotic, Not Adversarial
Anthropic takes 0% of plugin-driven revenue and 0% from the Marketplace at launch. This will not hold as platform leverage increases. The constraint: if Claude's commercial model damages HubSpot's unit economics, HubSpot deprioritises its MCP integration, plugin quality degrades, and Anthropic's routing value falls. The platform cannot extract rent from a degraded ecosystem. The likely commercial model is a tiered structure — premium placement, verified integrations, enterprise routing tiers — that taxes margin without breaking vendor unit economics. Vendors without switching costs are most exposed when that model arrives.